Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision		 Previous revision
academic_honesty [2023/10/25 14:50] – ntnsndracademic_honesty [2025/08/11 17:48] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 There are many forms of plagiarism: repeating another person's sentences or phrases as your own, paraphrasing someone else's argument as your own, and even presenting someone else's line of thinking in the development of a thesis as though it were your own. It is perfectly acceptable to reference the ideas and words of other people, but we must never submit someone else's work as if it were our own, without giving appropriate credit to the originator. There are many forms of plagiarism: repeating another person's sentences or phrases as your own, paraphrasing someone else's argument as your own, and even presenting someone else's line of thinking in the development of a thesis as though it were your own. It is perfectly acceptable to reference the ideas and words of other people, but we must never submit someone else's work as if it were our own, without giving appropriate credit to the originator.
 +
 +In general, all sources must be identified as clearly, accurately, and thoroughly as possible with [appropriate citation](https://nathanschneider.info/school/citation_standards). When in doubt about whether to identify a source, either cite the source or consult your instructor.
  
 Here are some specific guidelines to follow: Here are some specific guidelines to follow:
Line 13: Line 15:
 * *Common knowledge.* In an assignment, you will often use facts that you have gotten from a lecture, a written work, or some other source. If the facts are widely known among your readers or easy to find, it is usually not necessary to provide a source. (In a paper on American history, for example, it would not ordinarily be necessary to give a source for the statement that the Civil War began in 1861 after the inauguration of Abraham Lincoln.) However, if the facts are not widely known or if the facts were developed or presented by a specific source, then you should identify the source for those facts. * *Common knowledge.* In an assignment, you will often use facts that you have gotten from a lecture, a written work, or some other source. If the facts are widely known among your readers or easy to find, it is usually not necessary to provide a source. (In a paper on American history, for example, it would not ordinarily be necessary to give a source for the statement that the Civil War began in 1861 after the inauguration of Abraham Lincoln.) However, if the facts are not widely known or if the facts were developed or presented by a specific source, then you should identify the source for those facts.
 * *Ideas.* If you use concepts or ideas that you learned from a lecture, written work, or some other source, then you should identify the source. You should identify the source for an idea whether or not you agree with the idea. * *Ideas.* If you use concepts or ideas that you learned from a lecture, written work, or some other source, then you should identify the source. You should identify the source for an idea whether or not you agree with the idea.
-* *Artificial intelligence.* Generative AI is a useful tool for content generation, though it should not serve as a replacement for creating original work in your academic career. AI is likely to produce [less creative](http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~kgajos/papers/2020/arnold20predictcive.shtml) and [more biased](https://mauricejakesch.com/assets/pdf/thesis_jakesch_cornell_phd.pdf) outputs than what a well-educated human would create alone. AI outputs are often factually incorrect or misleading. The underlying data an AI uses may itself be a form of plagiarism, which compounds the ethical concerns. (AI-generated text often produces flags from plagiarism-checkers.) If AI is used to generate any content that you turn in, it should be credited like any other source. Do not present AI-generated content as your own, as it poses a serious plagiarism risk. +* *Artificial intelligence.* Generative AI is a useful tool for many purposes, though it should not serve as a replacement for creating original work in your academic career. AI is likely to produce [less original](http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~kgajos/papers/2020/arnold20predictcive.shtml) and [more biased](https://mauricejakesch.com/assets/pdf/thesis_jakesch_cornell_phd.pdf) outputs than what a skilled human would create. AI outputs are often factually incorrect or misleading. The underlying data an AI uses [may itself be a form of plagiarism](https://nytco-assets.nytimes.com/2023/12/NYT_Complaint_Dec2023.pdf), which compounds the ethical concerns. You are welcome to use AI tools to augment your work. But **if AI is used to generate any content that you turn in, it should be credited like any other source**, including the software used. You are ultimately responsible for the quality of what you turn in.
- +
-In general, all sources must be identified as clearly, accurately, and thoroughly as possible with [appropriate citation](https://nathanschneider.info/school/citation_standards). When in doubt about whether to identify a source, either cite the source or consult your instructor.+
  
 --- ---
  
 *This document draws substantially from the syllabus statements by my colleague [Rick Stevens](https://www.colorado.edu/cmci/people/college-leadership/j-richard-stevens).* *This document draws substantially from the syllabus statements by my colleague [Rick Stevens](https://www.colorado.edu/cmci/people/college-leadership/j-richard-stevens).*
  • academic_honesty.1698259850.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2025/08/11 17:48
  • (external edit)