Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| media_activism [2022/12/12 13:01] – ntnsndr | media_activism [2025/08/11 17:48] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| **MDST 5002** | **MDST 5002** | ||
| - | Depending on whom you ask, media-powered activism can sound like either a silver bullet or a lost cause. It's often both at the same time and more in between. Through | + | Depending on whom you ask, media-powered activism can sound like either a silver bullet or a lost cause. It's often both at the same time and more in between. Through |
| - | The central | + | The central |
| ## Instructor | ## Instructor | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| * Cultivate habits of media activism by doing it through passionate, strategic, pragmatic advocacy | * Cultivate habits of media activism by doing it through passionate, strategic, pragmatic advocacy | ||
| * Analyze theories and lessons from a wide range of social-change campaigns throughout history and around the world | * Analyze theories and lessons from a wide range of social-change campaigns throughout history and around the world | ||
| - | * Articulate a theory of change that informs | + | * Articulate a theory of change that informs |
| - | * Create a ready-to-deploy media intervention | + | * Create a ready-to-deploy media intervention |
| ## Expectations | ## Expectations | ||
| - | ### Weekly | + | As a foundation for all else, students are expected to complete the weekly reading assignments. This does not necessarily mean microscopic reading of every page, but it does mean engaging rigorously with portions of particular interest, as well as familiarizing oneself with the works as a whole and thinking critically about their interconnections. Come to class prepared with notes on specific quotations and ideas that you want to discuss. |
| - | Students are expected to complete the weekly reading assignments. This does not necessarily mean microscopic reading of every page, but it does mean engaging rigorously with portions of particular interest, as well as familiarizing oneself with the works as a whole and thinking critically about their interconnections. | + | ### Interventions (30%) |
| - | #### Interventions | + | Most weeks, students turn in an Intervention. These Interventions |
| - | Each week, students turn in an Intervention. These Interventions are simple, informal multimedia sketches that contain | + | Interventions may take the form of a drawing, infographic, |
| - | Interventions may take the form of a drawing, infographic, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | | + | |
| * Communicate a problem and a creative proposal by which to address it, expressed through appropriate and engaging media | * Communicate a problem and a creative proposal by which to address it, expressed through appropriate and engaging media | ||
| * Practice adventuresome thinking in both concept and presentation, | * Practice adventuresome thinking in both concept and presentation, | ||
| - | Students are invited to view and comment on each other' | + | Students are invited to view and comment on each other' |
| - | #### Class discussions (30%) | + | ### Class discussions (30%) |
| - | Students should be active participants and make contributions to the oral discussion that reflect strenuous [[engagement with assigned sources|engagement]] with the assigned texts. | + | Students should be active participants and make contributions to the oral discussion that reflect strenuous [[engagement with assigned sources|engagement]] with the assigned texts. |
| - | Evaluation of discussion contributions takes place twice: at the middle of the semester and at the end. | + | Evaluation of discussion contributions takes place twice: at the middle of the semester and at the end. Students are expected to: |
| - | * Engage actively and strenuously with the bulk of each unit's assigned texts over the course of that unit's comments, with direct quotations, evidence of close reading, and thoughtful analysis | + | * Engage actively and strenuously with the bulk of each unit's assigned texts, |
| * Interact respectfully and critically with fellow students, demonstrating careful attention to others and presenting reasoned articulations of one's views | * Interact respectfully and critically with fellow students, demonstrating careful attention to others and presenting reasoned articulations of one's views | ||
| + | Participation in all sessions is an expectation for the course. Full or partial absences from class, due to circumstances beyond the student' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Before the end of each evaluation period, you are welcome to propose the grade you think you have earned with a one-paragraph explanation, | ||
| ### Final project (40%) | ### Final project (40%) | ||
| - | Each student will complete a final project that is ready to deploy upon completion, in partnership with a relevant organization, | + | Each student will complete a final project that is ready to deploy upon completion, in partnership with a relevant organization, |
| - | After discussing the topic with the instructor, students will turn in a proposal that explains and justifies the project' | + | After discussing the topic with the instructor, students will turn in a proposal that explains and justifies the project' |
| - | Students will constructively review complete drafts of each other' | + | Students will constructively review complete drafts of each other' |
| * Proposal: **(40%)** | * Proposal: **(40%)** | ||
| - | * Explain and justify the project idea in a 1, | + | * Explain and justify the media intervention |
| - | * Describe the community | + | * Describe the partner |
| - | * Articulate | + | * Propose an intended medium and the scope of project deliverables, including rationale for each, in the context of an explicit |
| - | * Include strong evidence of background research, | + | * Include strong evidence of background research, |
| * Complete draft: **(10%)** | * Complete draft: **(10%)** | ||
| - | * Produce | + | * Circulate |
| - | * Include | + | * Include |
| * Peer review: **(10%)** | * Peer review: **(10%)** | ||
| * Provide feedback for at least two fellow students' | * Provide feedback for at least two fellow students' | ||
| * Final draft: **(40%)** | * Final draft: **(40%)** | ||
| - | * Produce a project | + | * Produce a media intervention |
| - | * Reflect rigorous [[engagement with assigned sources|engagement with assigned sources]] and course themes, in project and/or revised proposal | + | |
| * Demonstrate collaborative engagement with community partner, such as through testimonies or other evidence of their participation | * Demonstrate collaborative engagement with community partner, such as through testimonies or other evidence of their participation | ||
| - | * Present a plausible | + | * Present a promising |
| + | * Include a project statement that meets the same specifications as the proposal | ||
| - | #### Final grades | + | ### Evaluation |
| - | Based on the stated point structure, grades will be awarded as follows: A (94-100), A- (90-93), B+ (87-89), B (83-86), B- (80-82), C+ (77-79), C (73-76), C- (70-72), D+ (67-69), D (63-66), D- (60-62), F (0-59). | + | Based on the stated point structure, grades will be awarded as follows: A (94-100), A- (90-93), B+ (87-89), B (83-86), B- (80-82), C+ (77-79), C (73-76), C- (70-72), D+ (67-69), D (63-66), D- (60-62), F (0-59). The minimum passing grade is 60 for undergraduates and 70 for graduate students. |
| - | ### Schedule | + | Extensions under extenuating circumstances are possible by arrangement with the instructor prior to the due date; otherwise, late work is subject to a penalty of one letter grade per day. |
| - | Each week: | + | Generative AI is permitted but should be credited as such and must not serve as a substitute for doing your own thinking and work. |
| - | + | ||
| - | * Interventions are due in the appropriate online discussion unit at noon on Tuesdays | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | For the final project: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * Consult with the instructor on the final project concept, via email or meeting, by Tuesday, March 1 | + | |
| - | * Proposals are due on Canvas at noon on Tuesday, March 8 | + | |
| - | * Drafts are due in the online discussion at noon on Tuesday, April 19 | + | |
| - | * Peer review comments are due in the online discussion at noon on Thursday, April 21 | + | |
| - | * Final drafts are due in Canvas at noon on April 26 | + | |
| ## Agreements | ## Agreements | ||
| - | * We work together to foster a respectful, mature, convivial community based on mutual learning through our diverse perspectives | + | * We work together to foster a respectful, mature, convivial community based on mutual learning through our diverse perspectives. |
| - | * When problems arise, we will seek to address them collaboratively whenever possible. | + | |
| * We respect one another' | * We respect one another' | ||
| - | * We adhere to all [[university policies]] | + | * We adhere to all [[university policies]], as well as course guidelines on [[academic |
| - | * We accommodate disabilities and other diverse needs, making use of our own capacities and [[campus resources]]. | + | * We strive to accommodate disabilities and other diverse needs, making use of our own capacities and [[campus resources]]. Please discuss any particular support you require with the instructor. |
| ## Shared texts | ## Shared texts | ||
| - | Throughout the course we will be reading | + | Throughout the course we will be reading |
| - | * Zeynep Tufekci, | + | * Zeynep Tufekci, |
| - | * adrienne maree brown, _Emergent Strategy: Shaping Change, Changing Worlds_ (AK Press, 2017) | + | * Sasha Costanza-Chock, |
| - | * Sasha Costanza-Chock, | + | |
| + | In addition, we will read and discuss other shorter works as well. | ||
| - | ### 1. Points | + | ### 1. Theories |
| + | * Saul Alinsky, "[The Education of an Organizer](https:// | ||
| + | * Audre Lorde, "[The Master' | ||
| * Donella Meadows, " | * Donella Meadows, " | ||
| - | * Marshall Ganz, " | ||
| - | * Franz Fanon, " | ||
| - | |||
| - | ### 2. "A networked public" | ||
| - | |||
| - | * Prologue, introduction, | ||
| - | ### 3. " | + | ### 2. Twitter and Tear Gas: Part I |
| - | * Chapters 3--4 in Tufekci, _Twitter and Tear Gas_ | + | * Prologue, introduction, |
| - | ### 4. "A protester' | + | ### 3. Twitter and Tear Gas: Part II |
| * Part II in Tufekci, _Twitter and Tear Gas_ | * Part II in Tufekci, _Twitter and Tear Gas_ | ||
| - | ### 5. "After the protests" | + | ### 4. Twitter and Tear Gas: Part III |
| * Part III and Epilogue in Tufekci, _Twitter and Tear Gas_ | * Part III and Epilogue in Tufekci, _Twitter and Tear Gas_ | ||
| - | ### 6. Case study | + | ### 5. Mobilizing publics |
| - | Choose an historical example of a social movement from [Beautiful Trouble](https://beautifultrouble.org/case/), [Beautiful Rising](https://beautifulrising.org/type/story), or the [Global Nonviolent Action Database](https://nvdatabase.swarthmore.edu/). Consider it in light of the book we just read. Do some additional research to examine the mediated components of it, and prepare to present an analysis in class as your Intervention. | + | * Sarah J. Jackson and Brooke Foucault Welles, "[Hijacking #MYNYPD: Social Media Dissent and Networked Counterpublics](https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12185)," _Journal of Communication_ 65, no. 6 (2015) |
| + | * Merlyna Lim, "[Freedom to Hate: Social Media, Algorithmic Enclaves, and the Rise of Tribal Nationalism in Indonesia](https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2017.1341188)," _Critical Asian Studies_ 49, no. 3 (2017) | ||
| + | * Zizi Papacharissi, | ||
| - | ### 7. "The Matrix of Domination" | + | *By this time, consult with instructor on final project topic.* |
| - | * Introduction and chapters 1--2 in Costanza-Chock, | + | ### 6. Case study |
| - | ### 8. " | + | Choose an historical example of a social movement from [Beautiful Trouble](https:// |
| - | * Chapters 3--4 in Costanza-Chock, | + | ### 7. Media tactics |
| - | ### 9. "Pedagogies" | + | * Paulo Freire, chapter 2 in _[The Pedagogy of the Oppressed](https:// |
| + | * Marshall Ganz, "[Public Narrative, Collective Action, and Power](https:// | ||
| + | * Martin Luther King, Jr., " | ||
| - | * Chapter 5 and "Directions for Future Work" | + | ### 8. "The matrix of domination" |
| - | ### 10. Case study | + | * Introduction and chapters 1--2 in Costanza-Chock, |
| - | Choose an historical example of a social movement from [Beautiful Trouble](https:// | + | *Project proposal due; no Intervention.* |
| - | ### 11. "Fractals" | + | ### 9. "Narratives" |
| - | * " | + | * Chapters 3--4 in Costanza-Chock, _Design Justice_ |
| - | ### 12. "Resilience" | + | ### 10. "Pedagogies" |
| - | * " | + | * Chapter 5 and "Directions for Future Work" in Costanza-Chock, _Design Justice_ |
| - | ### 13. Case study | + | ### 11. Case study |
| Choose an historical example of a social movement from [Beautiful Trouble](https:// | Choose an historical example of a social movement from [Beautiful Trouble](https:// | ||
| - | ### 14. Aftermath | + | ### 12. Glimpses of change |
| - | * Wu Hung, "[Tiananmen Square: A Political History of Monuments](https://www.jstor.org/stable/2928718)," | + | * Marisol de la Cadena, "[Indigenous Cosmopolitics in the Andes: Conceptual Reflections beyond ' |
| + | * Walidah Imarisha, "[All Organizing Is Science Fiction](https:// | ||
| * Ursula K. Le Guin, "[The Day Before the Revolution](http:// | * Ursula K. Le Guin, "[The Day Before the Revolution](http:// | ||
| - | --- | ||
| - | [ [[note: | + | ### 13. Final reflections |
| + | |||
| + | Be prepared to discuss lessons from your final project in class. | ||
| + | *Final projects due; no Intervention.* | ||