Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
media_public:syllabus [2015/11/28 18:16]
nathanairplane created
— (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
-# Media and the Public 
- 
-In this class, we will learn about what it means to be a mediated public by becoming one and reflecting on our practice. As we discuss critical and primary readings on media, democracy, and the public sphere, the class will undergo a process together. We will cultivate our own public sphere, setting rules and adjusting them as we go. The midterm and final projects are short exercises in established genres of media intervention. 
- 
-## Objectives 
- 
-  * Practice participating a lively community of discussion and debate, and making significant media interventions within it 
-  * Familiarize ourselves with past and present debates about media and democracy 
-  * Develop habits of critical engagement with mainstream and alternative news sources 
-  * Articulate a vision for a democratic public sphere 
- 
-## Expectations 
- 
-Each student is expected to: 
- 
-  * contribute every week to our public sphere, before noon on Thursday, with at least 2 posts and/or comments (at most one post per week) in the D2L discussion (including text, video, or other media) in some way that connects the readings; engagement with the current news cycle and popular culture is strongly encouraged. 
-  * be an active participant,​ through listening and speaking, in oral discussions during class time. 
-  * adhere to the [[agreements]] that we set out jointly in class. 
- 
-### Midterm project 
- 
-For this assignment, draft, revise, and publish an 800-to-900-word op-ed (authored by yourself) or press release (promoting an invented initiative or product from a real organization or company) that makes an intervention in a matter of current public concern, framed in terms of democratic ideals. Through it, make clear the importance and relevance of one or more such ideal. 
- 
-  * For op-eds, see the notes on op-ed [structure](http://​www.theopedproject.org/​index.php?​option=com_content&​view=article&​id=68&​Itemid=80) and [tips](http://​www.theopedproject.org/​index.php?​option=com_content&​view=article&​id=67&​Itemid=79) from the Op-Ed Project, and browse the op-ed pages of papers like the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, and the Washington Post 
-  * For press releases, simple templates for the expected format can be found here and here. For more inspiration,​ try to find press releases published by the organization you choose or others like it 
- 
-This project should meet the following expectations:​ 
- 
-  * Format: 
-    * Adherence to AP Style 
-    * Adherence to standard op-ed or press release format 
-    * Correct length, spelling, and grammar 
-  * Responsible advocacy: 
-    * Clarity of argument 
-    * Support of argument through evidence, documented in the text and through hyperlinks 
-    * Framing of the argument in comparison to contrasting positions, demonstrating a sophisticated grasp of the discourse on the topic 
-    * Transparency about the interests and position of the author 
-    * Articulation of democratic ideal(s) 
- 
-### Final project 
- 
-For this assignment, draft, revise, and publish an analysis of a media campaign of your choosing, individually or as part of a group. Written projects should be between 1,400-1,600 words, and videos between 4-6 minutes. Standards for other media should be agreed on with the instructor. 
- 
-Campaigns might include, for instance: an Internet meme, a politician'​s slogan, an iconic advertisement,​ a university marketing drive, a blacklisting effort, a struggle for political rights. 
- 
-The medium should be a recognizable genre of some sort that attempts to make an intervention in a particular audience. You might create, for instance: a news report, an instructional video, a fictional internal corporate memo, a business case study, a presentation,​ a formal letter, a rant of tweets. 
- 
-The expectations are as follows: 
- 
-  * A carefully documented and persuasive argument about the campaign, grounded in an analysis of its planning, execution, effectiveness,​ use of media, and relevant publics 
-  * Engagement with some key themes, readings, and discussions in the course, such as democracy, economic models, ethics, and perspective 
-  * Adherence to the topic, medium, and scope agreed on with the instructor 
-  * Excellence in execution, including grammar, spelling, AP Style (if written), visual clarity, and other standards relevant to the medium 
- 
-## Evaluation 
- 
-Grades will be determined as follows: 
- 
-  * 25 points - quality and persistence of in-class participation 
-  * 25 points - quality and persistence of participation in online discussions 
-  * 20 points - midterm project: 
-    * 10 points - first draft and participation in peer review 
-    * 10 points - revision with evidence of improvement 
-  * 30 points - final project: 
-    * 10 points - first draft and participation in peer review 
-    * 10 points - revision with evidence of improvement 
-    * 10 points - anonymous feedback from fellow students 
- 
-Each student is allotted 3 unexcused absences. After that, absences without a documented excuse will result in 5 points detracted from the class participation grade. 
- 
-Badges, worth 1 extra point, will be awarded at the conclusion of each module: 
- 
-  * The Virality Badge goes to the thread with the largest number of views 
-  * The Provocation Badge goes to the thread with the largest number of comments 
-  * The Insight Badge goes to the post that, in the view of the instructor, makes an especially strong contribution to the quality of the discussion and reflects the insights of the readings 
-  * The Reflexivity Badge goes to the post that best contributes to the self-reflection our our class public, in the form of either commentary or a concrete proposal for change 
- 
-There is a limit of one badge per person per week. 
- 
-## Units 
- 
-  * [[Democracy]] 
-  * [[Private and publics]] 
-  * [[Objectivity and perspective]] 
-  * [[Media ethics]] 
-  * [[Business models]] 
-  * [[The commons]] 
-  * [[Filters and bubbles]] 
-  * [[Making movements]] 
-  * [[Leaks, repression, censorship]] 
-  * [[Public intellectualism]] 
-  * [[Harassment,​ abuse, accountability]] 
-  * [[Tactical media]] 
- 
---- 
- 
-*This syllabus is a living document. Any part of it may be brought up for discussion and modified by agreement of those present during any official class period.*