Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
monopoly [2018/04/23 23:57]
ntnsndr [Public utility regulation]
monopoly [2018/05/31 23:53]
ntnsndr [Platform economy antitrust]
Line 63: Line 63:
     * Gestures toward such suggestions as: disaggregating Google services across multiple firms; using government power to require default adoption of a competitor such as Bing     * Gestures toward such suggestions as: disaggregating Google services across multiple firms; using government power to require default adoption of a competitor such as Bing
     * "The case of Google requires us to consider all alternatives,​ including the deliberate use of public resources to maintain effective choice in information sources on the Internet."​     * "The case of Google requires us to consider all alternatives,​ including the deliberate use of public resources to maintain effective choice in information sources on the Internet."​
 +  * [Freedom from Facebook](https://​freedomfromfb.com/​) - a campaign to "Break up Facebook'​s Monopoly",​ led by Demand Progress and others
   * Haucap, Justus and Ulrich Heimeshoff. "​[Google,​ Facebook, Amazon, eBay: Is the Internet driving competition or market monopolization?​](https://​link.springer.com/​article/​10.1007/​s10368-013-0247-6)."​ _International Economics and Economic Policy_ 11, no 1-2 (February 2014).   * Haucap, Justus and Ulrich Heimeshoff. "​[Google,​ Facebook, Amazon, eBay: Is the Internet driving competition or market monopolization?​](https://​link.springer.com/​article/​10.1007/​s10368-013-0247-6)."​ _International Economics and Economic Policy_ 11, no 1-2 (February 2014).
     * "we use our theoretical insights to examine whether (a) leading Internet platforms have non-temporary market power and, based on this analysis, (b) whether any specific market regulation beyond general competition law rules is warranted"​     * "we use our theoretical insights to examine whether (a) leading Internet platforms have non-temporary market power and, based on this analysis, (b) whether any specific market regulation beyond general competition law rules is warranted"​
Line 92: Line 93:
   * Khan, Lina. "​[[source:​khan-amazons_antitrust_paradox|Amazon'​s Antitrust Paradox]]."​ _Yale Law Journal_ 126 (2017).   * Khan, Lina. "​[[source:​khan-amazons_antitrust_paradox|Amazon'​s Antitrust Paradox]]."​ _Yale Law Journal_ 126 (2017).
   * Khan, Lina. "[The Supreme Court Case That Could Give Tech Giants More Power](https://​www.nytimes.com/​2018/​03/​02/​opinion/​the-supreme-court-case-that-could-give-tech-giants-more-power.html)."​ _The New York Times_. March 2, 2018.   * Khan, Lina. "[The Supreme Court Case That Could Give Tech Giants More Power](https://​www.nytimes.com/​2018/​03/​02/​opinion/​the-supreme-court-case-that-could-give-tech-giants-more-power.html)."​ _The New York Times_. March 2, 2018.
 +  * Luckerson, Victor. "​[‘Crush Them’: An Oral History of the Lawsuit That Upended Silicon Valley](https://​www.theringer.com/​tech/​2018/​5/​18/​17362452/​microsoft-antitrust-lawsuit-netscape-internet-explorer-20-years)."​ _The Ringer_. May 18, 2018.
   * Manne, Geoffrey A. and Joshua D. Wright. "​[Google and the Limits of Antitrust: The Case Against the Case Against Google](http://​heinonline.org/​HOL/​Page?​handle=hein.journals/​hjlpp34&​id=&​page=&​collection=journals&​id=177)."​ _Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy_ 34, no. 1 (Winter 2011).   * Manne, Geoffrey A. and Joshua D. Wright. "​[Google and the Limits of Antitrust: The Case Against the Case Against Google](http://​heinonline.org/​HOL/​Page?​handle=hein.journals/​hjlpp34&​id=&​page=&​collection=journals&​id=177)."​ _Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy_ 34, no. 1 (Winter 2011).
     * Emphasizes that the risk of antitrust intervention outweighs the degree of certainty that Google'​s behavior is anticompetitive     * Emphasizes that the risk of antitrust intervention outweighs the degree of certainty that Google'​s behavior is anticompetitive